I will audit your ict deal for scope gaps and margin leaks before you sign

You already sense something is off in this deal. You just cannot prove it yet.

The scope reads fine. The margin looked fine. But you have been burned before: the job that bled hours nobody quoted, the "included" work that wasn't, the go-live that slipped on an assumption no one wrote down.

I've spent 8 years across Telstra's ICT channel, from front-line support to running project delivery, which means the deals I review get checked against what delivery can actually build, not what a proposal hopes it can. That's the gap most reviewers can't close.

What I check for:

• Scope gaps: unstated assumptions and "obvious" inclusions that become unpaid work
• Margin leaks: where the costing quietly stops covering the real effort
• Fit: whether the solution is right-sized for the site, or over/under-spec'd
• Handoff risk: what sales promised that delivery will struggle to honour

This is the same pre-signature discipline I ran inside Telstra's channel: a quality gate that stopped defective deals before they reached engineers, and margin checks that killed post-delivery surprises.

You get a plain, prioritised report you can act on before you sign.

Not sure which fits? Send the deal and message me