Browse categories
Explore
Fiverr Pro
English
$
USD
I will review your ai built saas code for production readiness
Dimitar S
About this gig
Your SaaS app works in the demo. The question before real users, funding, or your first enterprise customer is different: is it safe to launch and scale, or will something break first?
I do a read-only production-readiness review for apps built with Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable, Bolt, v0, Replit, Copilot, or similar tools. I review architecture and AI-code-specific failure modes that don't show up in a demo: weak boundaries, client-side trust mistakes, thin tests, duplicated generated code, and logic the team can't explain.
You get a written memo with a go/no-go assessment, your top risks named in your actual code, and what to fix first. Every tier includes a recorded Loom walkthrough.
I bring 25+ years in software and 15+ years as an enterprise architect. I created and led a multi-agent AI platform from prototype to production with a 16+ engineer team. I build daily with the same tools your team used.
This is a review, not implementation. I don't change your code, and the recommendation can be "stop."
Get to know Dimitar S
Dimitar S
Principal AI Architect, Fractional CTO, SaaS, Tech Due Diligence
- FromBulgaria
- Member sinceJun 2026
Languages
English
I help founders, CTOs and investors make high-stakes technical decisions before they become expensive. I review SaaS and AI/GenAI architecture, production readiness, scalability, technical debt, team capability, and acquisitions. I also provide fractional CTO support, AI architecture/engineering, due diligence, and fix-vs-refactor-vs-rewrite assessments. 25+ years in software, 15+ in architecture, former Global VP of AI at Endava and Enterprise Architect at Accenture. Hands-on with modern AI stacks, including agents, RAG, vector/graph DBs, Claude Code, Cursor and Codex.
FAQ
What's the difference between the packages?
Basic gives you the single scariest risk and a go/no-go assessment in 48 hours. Standard goes wider across Security, Scalability, and Reliability with 3-5 ranked findings. Premium adds a survey across the remaining 5 production dimensions so obvious red flags are not missed.
Do you fix the code?
No. This is a read-only review. The fix plan is a separate engagement.
What if the assessment is "stop"?
You get an honest answer. Better to know in 2 days than after launch.
Do you need code access?
Yes, read-only on one repo. Mutual NDA signed before access. I don't run your code through external AI tools and I delete my copy after delivery.
What size codebase?
One repository, up to roughly 150k lines of application code (excluding generated files, dependencies, lockfiles, build artifacts). Larger or multi-repo: message me first.
Is this a security audit?
No. I flag security-relevant architecture risks I find, but this is not a penetration test, vulnerability assessment, or compliance certification.
Which AI tools do you cover?
Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Bolt, Lovable, Replit, Copilot, v0, and similar. Stacks: Next.js, React, Node.js, Python, Supabase, Firebase, Vercel, Netlify, and others.
What's out of scope?
Multi-repo systems, penetration testing, compliance certification (SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001), load testing, and line-by-line code quality review. Message me first for those.
