I will prepare your eb2 niw or eb1a rfe response

I first review the actual RFE and your resume to understand USCIS's concerns, your qualifications, and whether the original petition strategy fits your background.

Very urgent. Since mid-September 2026, many RFEs I am seeing allow about 30 days to respond, so evidence collection and strategy must begin immediately.

Often USCIS identifies genuine weaknesses, but not always. Officers may mischaracterize evidence, misunderstand the endeavor, or occasionally reference the wrong facts.

The petitioner does. Under Matter of Chawathe, eligibility generally must be established by a preponderance of the evidence - more likely than not.

You may clarify and supplement the original filing, but materially changing the basis of eligibility can create problems. Matter of Izummi addresses material changes, while Matter of Katigbak reinforces that eligibility must exist when filed.

No. Dhanasar establishes the NIW three-prong framework, but USCIS also applies statutes, regulations, evidentiary rules, policy guidance, and other precedent decisions.

Not by itself. Under Matter of Caron International, USCIS may treat expert opinions as advisory and give them less weight when they are unsupported or inconsistent with the record.

Usually not for important factual claims. Matter of Soffici reinforces that statements should be supported by documentary evidence.

Meeting three criteria does not end the analysis. USCIS then considers the entire record at final merits to determine whether the petitioner demonstrates sustained acclaim and is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

To identify what USCIS actually disputed, determine what can legally and factually be strengthened, close evidentiary gaps, and prepare a focused response without unnecessarily changing the original case theory.